A divided (ideologically bipartisan) Supreme Court ruled that a state law, allowing any company doing business in the state to be sued there – even if the corporation is not headquartered there and the alleged conduct giving rise to the lawsuit occurred elsewhere, did not violate the due-process clause. As a result of this opinion, litigants may now bring suit against out-of-state companies in the friendliest state in which the company is registered to do business, even if that jurisdiction has no connection to the events underlying the lawsuit.
This website uses cookies to deliver a better experience. By continuing on this website, you consent to our use of cookies.